Kittenplay Forum now at http://kittenplay.net

DaddysTouch · Veteran Member

Britain Moves to Ban Sex Stories

LostKitten · Senior Member

Yikes. Unbelievable. What in heaven's name, did a story ever do ? I would have thought that producing extreme hard core porn movies would be a target. Is there a law about porn movies in Britain?

TorbjornS · Veteran Member

what i now they hawe alrady law agenst movies and imges in britten.

Matt-Sama · Veteran Member

So much for free world governments.

Temko · Senior Member

*blinks* name one free world govermant of the last... 4000 years?

basicly, goverments worldwide are in 'ban mode', banning and restricting everything they can, and it's all basicly come down to three criteria.

- "war" on terror (dont get me started)

- Copyright/Patents

- Sex

it's a pretty simple step from here to fix this idiotcy in the goverments but it involves 1 small thing.

people thinking for 5 god damned minutes before voting instead of going by "he looked pretty"

-- Edited by Temko on Monday 6th of July 2009 06:37:50 AM

TorbjornS · Veteran Member

Temko I think bouth you and I now that the mairety of peppel don't think only thos that some one they now and are a litter bitte forwords thinks are right.

Matt-Sama · Veteran Member

the original set up for The US Government was set up as a free world government. The original concept of the colonies was free world. Naturally none of them lasted very long. Also just about all social governments such as Indian tribals. They were very open, and while there were social implications there weren't really 'legal' ramifications to such things. There were plenty of things set up and started as free world in just the last few hundred years. But it always collapses under the voice of the vocal minority bitching while the majority just sits back and lets it happen.

My whole point was that governments always restrict and do little more than cater to people without open minds. Technically BDSM is illegal in its practiced form in England. Just for an example.

TorbjornS · Veteran Member

Matt-Sama wrote:

the original set up for The US Government was set up as a free world government. The original concept of the colonies was free world. Naturally none of them lasted very long. Also just about all social governments such as Indian tribals. They were very open, and while there were social implications there weren't really 'legal' ramifications to such things. There were plenty of things set up and started as free world in just the last few hundred years. But it always collapses under the voice of the vocal minority bitching while the majority just sits back and lets it happen.

My whole point was that governments always restrict and do little more than cater to people without open minds. Technically BDSM is illegal in its practiced form in England. Just for an example.

A philosofi thougt, Contry how start by say they are open and libaral turn out to be more restricted then contry that says to be restricted. and dose seen to be mor libaral over time.

Smudge · Member

This is ridiculous. That is all I have to say. Why do we seem to be moving backwards in terms of censorship now?
Although I don't personally want to read porn-lit about necrophilia, I don't see how it is harmful at all. And who gets to decide what is offensive or disgusting? I'm sure most of what we do in the bedroom would offend and/or disgust somebody out there. Grr at these stupid laws. x

DaddysTouch · Veteran Member

Matt-Sama wrote:

Technically BDSM is illegal in its practiced form in England. Just for an example.

BDSM per se is not illegal. What is potentially illegal is causing injuries that are not 'trivial or transient'. This comes from a court case in the 50s where a group of gay sadomasochists photographed themselves hammering nails through each other's ball sacks and slicing their ****s open and stuff like that. So really serious injury like that has been ruled illegal, but many lawyers believe that if the same case were repeated today the men would have been found innocent, and that they were only found guilty because of prejudice against gays at the time.

There is no question that tying someone up, humiliation and such like are legal. Spanking, caning, flogging, slapping, wax and that sort of thing would all appear to be 'trivial or transient' and thus legal. There was a case a while ago that would appear to have ruled that breathe play is legal (IIRC, woman died when a man was choking her during sex, acquitted of murder as it was an accident and she had consented to being choked).